Hide Main content block

Home Page News Section

Home Page News Section

  • How big does the ‘works’ in ‘what works’ need to be?

    Anyone who knows me will know I am a keen runner. I have been so most my life with just a few ‘down periods’. The most recent down period was after a knee operation in 2013. I can think of three things that got me running again that time. Perhaps the most unexpected was reading an interview with Sylvester Stallone about staying fit at 60.
    Read More

  • Campbell Funding for Methods

    Request for proposals: contributions for methods development for systematic reviews. With the support of the American Institutes for Research, the Campbell Collaboration is pleased to announce up to five awards for methods development.The total amount to be awarded is US$80,000.Proposals for contributions for methods development for systematic reviews must be received by Monday, 20 February 2017.
    Read More

  • Campbell: a year in review

    It has been a busy year for Campbell. What were we up to in 2016? This blog of blogs in 2016 provides some insights on our activities.Our first focus this year was about how systematic is a systematic review, and the key role of meta-analysis in building research and enduring adequate reporting. Explained simply, a systematic review sums up the best available research on a specific question.
    Read More

  • QUIZ-Which development programmes work?

    Which development programmes, policies and practices are most cost-effective to help achieve the Sustainable Development Goals? Many development interventions sound intuitively appealing. We think they should improve people’s lives. But evidence shows that intuition isn’t reliable when determining whether interventions actually make a difference.
    Read More


Home Page Latest Campbell Evidence

Home Page Featured Review


Featured Review

Community Monitoring Interventions to Curb Corruption and Increase Access and Quality of Service Delivery in Low -and Middle-income Countries: A Systematic Review by Ezequiel Molina, Laura Carella, Ana Pacheco, Guillermo Cruces, and Leonardo Gasparini

Community Monitoring Interventions can reduce corruption.

This review assesses the evidence on the effects of community monitoring interventions on corruption and access and quality of service delivery outcomes. The review also considers the mechanism through which CMIs effect a change in corruption and service delivery outcomes, and possible moderating factors such as geographic region, income level or length of exposure to interventions.

Read More

Contact Us

  • P.O. Box 7004, St. Olavs plass,
    N-0130 Oslo, Norway
  • (+47) 23 25 50 00
  • (+47) 23 25 50 10
  • Web: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
  •  This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.